Screener
PHO vs PIO
Invesco Water Resources ETF vs Invesco Global Water ETF
Key differences
- PHO costs 0.16% less per year.
- PHO is significantly larger than PIO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PHO covers north america markets; PIO covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHO | PIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $281M |
| Since | 2005 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.6% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | +8.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 14.70% |
| Max drawdown | -34.92% | -35.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PHO and PIO
Explore further