Screener
PHYD vs SJNK
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- SJNK costs 0.15% less per year.
- SJNK is significantly larger than PHYD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PHYD follows a active selection strategy; SJNK uses index tracking.
- SJNK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHYD | SJNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 8.54% | 7.06% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.1% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +8.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.30% | 3.22% |
| Max drawdown | -4.33% | -19.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PHYD and SJNK
Explore further