Screener
PHYL vs GTOH
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF vs Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF
Key differences
Both PHYL and GTOH are fixed income ETFs. The main difference: PHYL follows a active selection strategy; GTOH uses index tracking.
- PHYL follows a active selection strategy; GTOH uses index tracking.
- Over the last three years, PHYL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHYL | GTOH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | — |
| Since | 2018 | — |
| Dividend yield | 7.66% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.2% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.35% | 3.02% |
| Max drawdown | -22.07% | -4.17% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.