Screener
PHYL vs PAB
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF vs PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PAB costs 0.20% less per year.
- PHYL is significantly larger than PAB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PHYL covers north america markets; PAB covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, PHYL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHYL | PAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $107M |
| Since | 2018 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 7.71% | 4.76% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.6% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.2% | +0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 0.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.30% | 3.88% |
| Max drawdown | -22.07% | -19.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PHYL and PAB
Explore further