Screener
PHYL vs SJNK
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- SJNK is significantly larger than PHYL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PHYL follows a active selection strategy; SJNK uses index tracking.
- SJNK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHYL | SJNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $4.8B |
| Since | 2018 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 7.71% | 7.06% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.3% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +8.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.3% | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.26% | 3.20% |
| Max drawdown | -22.07% | -19.74% |
Similar to PHYL and SJNK
Explore further