Screener
PICB vs VRIG
Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.20% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than PICB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PICB follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- PICB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PICB | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $360M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2010 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.29% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.9% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.1% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.30 | 2.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.88% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -37.15% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PICB and VRIG
Explore further