Screener
PICK vs EMXC
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
- EMXC costs 0.14% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than PICK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PICK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PICK | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $22.1B |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.40% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +83.4% | +73.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.2% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.81% | 21.58% |
| Max drawdown | -52.73% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PICK and EMXC
Explore further