Screener
PICK vs URTH
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.15% less per year.
- URTH is significantly larger than PICK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PICK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PICK | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $9.2B |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.40% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +83.4% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.2% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.81% | 12.17% |
| Max drawdown | -52.73% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PICK and URTH
Explore further