Screener
PID vs DIVZ
Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF vs Polen Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- PID costs 0.12% less per year.
- PID is significantly larger than DIVZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PID covers global markets; DIVZ covers north america.
- PID follows a index tracking strategy; DIVZ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DIVZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PID has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PID | DIVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $929M | $242M |
| Since | 2005 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.28% | 2.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.6% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.4% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.72% | 9.19% |
| Max drawdown | -46.07% | -15.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PID and DIVZ
Explore further