Screener
PINK vs BMED
Simplify Health Care ETF vs iShares Health Innovation Active ETF
Key differences
- PINK is significantly larger than BMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PINK follows a index tracking strategy; BMED uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PINK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PINK | BMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.51% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $241M | $10M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.07% | 14.93% |
| Max drawdown | -18.77% | -36.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PINK and BMED
Explore further