Screener
PINK vs RSPH
Simplify Health Care ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
Key differences
- RSPH costs 0.11% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, PINK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RSPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PINK | RSPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.51% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $241M | $685M |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 0.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +2.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.07% | 15.48% |
| Max drawdown | -18.77% | -30.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PINK and RSPH
Explore further