Screener
RSPH vs XHS
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF
Key differences
- XHS costs 0.05% less per year.
- RSPH is significantly larger than XHS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XHS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RSPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPH | XHS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $685M | $98M |
| Since | 2006 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 0.26% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +20.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.6% | +9.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | +1.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.01 | 0.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.48% | 17.56% |
| Max drawdown | -30.44% | -39.32% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPH and XHS
Explore further