Screener
PIO vs AQWA
Invesco Global Water ETF vs Global X Clean Water ETF
Key differences
- AQWA costs 0.25% less per year.
- PIO is significantly larger than AQWA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, AQWA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PIO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PIO | AQWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $281M | $26M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | +9.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | 0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.70% | 14.42% |
| Max drawdown | -35.76% | -29.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PIO and AQWA
Explore further