Screener
AQWA vs PHO
Global X Clean Water ETF vs Invesco Water Resources ETF
Key differences
- AQWA costs 0.09% less per year.
- PHO is significantly larger than AQWA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, AQWA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AQWA | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | -1.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.47 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.42% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -29.44% | -34.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AQWA and PHO
Explore further