Screener
PIO vs INRO
Invesco Global Water ETF vs iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- INRO costs 0.33% less per year.
- PIO is significantly larger than INRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PIO covers global markets; INRO covers north america.
- PIO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PIO | INRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $281M | $31M |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 0.69% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +34.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.70% | 12.93% |
| Max drawdown | -35.76% | -20.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PIO and INRO
Explore further