Screener
PIPE vs ENFR
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF vs Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- ENFR costs 0.40% less per year.
- ENFR is significantly larger than PIPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PIPE follows a active selection strategy; ENFR uses index tracking.
- ENFR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PIPE | ENFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $460M |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.64% | 3.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.4% | +27.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +21.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.18% | 14.54% |
| Max drawdown | -15.69% | -62.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PIPE and ENFR
Explore further