Screener
See all growth funds
PJP vs EQWL
Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF vs Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
Both PJP and EQWL are equity ETFs. PJP charges 0.57% a year and EQWL 0.25%. The main difference: PJP follows a index tracking strategy; EQWL uses index enhanced.
- PJP follows a index tracking strategy; EQWL uses index enhanced.
- EQWL costs 0.32% less per year.
- EQWL is much larger than PJP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EQWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PJP | EQWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $341M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2005 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.8% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.63% | 10.74% |
| Max drawdown | -33.95% | -34.30% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.