Skip to content
Screener

PJP vs EQWL

Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF vs Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF

PJP

Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF

Annual cost

0.57%

Fund size

$341M

EQWL

Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$2.6B

Key differences

Both PJP and EQWL are equity ETFs. PJP charges 0.57% a year and EQWL 0.25%. The main difference: PJP follows a index tracking strategy; EQWL uses index enhanced.

  • PJP follows a index tracking strategy; EQWL uses index enhanced.
  • EQWL costs 0.32% less per year.
  • EQWL is much larger than PJP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, EQWL has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

PJPEQWL
Annual cost (TER)0.57%0.25%
Fund size (AUM)$341M$2.6B
Since20052006
Dividend yield0.96%1.53%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+40.8%+21.1%
CAGR 3Y+15.9%+19.7%
CAGR 5Y+8.4%+11.7%
Sharpe 3Y0.791.17
Volatility 1Y16.63%10.74%
Max drawdown-33.95%-34.30%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to PJP and EQWL