Screener
PKB vs RFG
Invesco Building & Construction ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RFG costs 0.22% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, PKB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PKB | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $455M | $329M |
| Since | 2005 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.2% | +34.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.3% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.1% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.16% | 18.65% |
| Max drawdown | -52.30% | -42.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PKB and RFG
Explore further