Screener
PKB vs RPG
Invesco Building & Construction ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG costs 0.22% less per year.
- RPG is significantly larger than PKB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PKB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PKB | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $455M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2005 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.2% | +39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.3% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.1% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.16% | 19.79% |
| Max drawdown | -52.30% | -36.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PKB and RPG
Explore further