Screener
PKW vs RFV
Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RFV costs 0.27% less per year.
- PKW is significantly larger than RFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PKW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PKW | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $313M |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.30% | 18.26% |
| Max drawdown | -40.93% | -52.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PKW and RFV
Explore further