Screener
RFV vs IPKW
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF
Key differences
- RFV costs 0.20% less per year.
- RFV covers north america markets; IPKW covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IPKW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | IPKW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $530M |
| Since | 2006 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 3.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.6% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.26% | 14.37% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -47.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFV and IPKW
Explore further