Screener
POWR vs IGF
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- POWR covers north america markets; IGF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| POWR | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $10.7B |
| Since | — | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.4% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.3% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.55 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.48% | 10.43% |
| Max drawdown | -63.42% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to POWR and IGF
Explore further