Screener
PPH vs IWB
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
Both PPH and IWB are equity ETFs. PPH charges 0.36% a year and IWB 0.15%. The main difference: IWB costs 0.21% less per year.
- IWB costs 0.21% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than PPH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPH | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $942M | $48.9B |
| Since | 2011 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 2.06% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.68% | 12.39% |
| Max drawdown | -29.70% | -34.60% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.