Screener
PPI vs AOA
Astoria Real Asset ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOA costs 0.43% less per year.
- AOA is significantly larger than PPI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PPI is classified as alternative, while AOA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- PPI follows a active selection strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PPI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AOA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPI | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2021 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 10.72% |
| Max drawdown | -24.54% | -28.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPI and AOA
Explore further