Screener
PPI vs MID
Astoria Real Asset ETF vs American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF
Key differences
- MID costs 0.13% less per year.
- PPI is classified as alternative, while MID is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, PPI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPI | MID | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $93M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 0.16% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 16.69% |
| Max drawdown | -24.54% | -40.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPI and MID
Explore further