Screener
PPI vs OACP
Astoria Real Asset ETF vs OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF
Key differences
- PPI costs 0.16% less per year.
- PPI is classified as alternative, while OACP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- PPI follows a active selection strategy; OACP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PPI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPI | OACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.74% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $256M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 3.58% |
| Max drawdown | -24.54% | -11.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPI and OACP
Explore further