Screener
PPI vs OALC
Astoria Real Asset ETF vs OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- OALC costs 0.09% less per year.
- PPI is classified as alternative, while OALC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PPI follows a active selection strategy; OALC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, OALC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPI | OALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $220M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | +34.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 13.05% |
| Max drawdown | -24.54% | -26.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPI and OALC
Explore further