Screener
PPI vs OAIM
Astoria Real Asset ETF vs OneAscent International Equity ETF
Key differences
- PPI costs 0.37% less per year.
- PPI is classified as alternative, while OAIM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PPI follows a active selection strategy; OAIM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PPI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPI | OAIM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $344M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 15.74% |
| Max drawdown | -24.54% | -14.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPI and OAIM
Explore further