Screener
PPI vs QGRO
Astoria Real Asset ETF vs American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- QGRO costs 0.29% less per year.
- QGRO is significantly larger than PPI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PPI is classified as alternative, while QGRO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PPI follows a active selection strategy; QGRO uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, PPI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPI | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 0.20% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | +12.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 15.40% |
| Max drawdown | -24.54% | -32.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPI and QGRO
Explore further