Screener
PRN vs PHO
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF vs Invesco Water Resources ETF
Key differences
- PHO is significantly larger than PRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PRN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PRN | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $401M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +69.7% | -1.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.4% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.2% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.57% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -36.27% | -34.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PRN and PHO
Explore further