Screener
PSC vs ACSG
Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- PSC costs 0.11% less per year.
- PSC is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSC follows a index tracking strategy; ACSG uses active selection.
- PSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSC | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $15M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.83% | — |
| Max drawdown | -46.75% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSC and ACSG
Explore further