Screener
PSC vs AFSM
Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- PSC costs 0.37% less per year.
- PSC is significantly larger than AFSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSC follows a index tracking strategy; AFSM uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSC | AFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $94M |
| Since | 2016 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.83% | 17.84% |
| Max drawdown | -46.75% | -43.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSC and AFSM
Explore further