Screener
PSC vs AMID
Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs Argent Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- PSC costs 0.14% less per year.
- PSC is significantly larger than AMID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSC follows a index tracking strategy; AMID uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PSC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSC | AMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $109M |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | +12.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | 0.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.83% | 16.10% |
| Max drawdown | -46.75% | -23.32% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSC and AMID
Explore further