Screener
PSC vs BASG
Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
Key differences
- PSC costs 0.23% less per year.
- PSC is significantly larger than BASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSC covers north america markets; BASG covers global.
- PSC follows a index tracking strategy; BASG uses active selection.
- PSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSC | BASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $467M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.93% | — |
| Max drawdown | -46.75% | -19.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSC and BASG
Explore further