Screener
PSCF vs RSP
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
- RSP costs 0.09% less per year.
- RSP is significantly larger than PSCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSCF follows a index tracking strategy; RSP uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, PSCF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RSP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSCF | RSP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $86.4B |
| Since | 2010 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 2.34% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.56% | 11.73% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -39.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSCF and RSP
Explore further