Screener
PSCF vs RWL
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- PSCF costs 0.10% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than PSCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSCF | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $8.8B |
| Since | 2010 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.34% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.56% | 10.14% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -36.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSCF and RWL
Explore further