Screener
PSET vs LCOW
Principal Quality ETF vs Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Key differences
- PSET costs 0.34% less per year.
- PSET has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSET | LCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $23M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.5% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.82% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -34.74% | -10.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSET and LCOW
Explore further