Screener
PSET vs SCOW
Principal Quality ETF vs Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Key differences
- PSET costs 0.44% less per year.
- PSET is significantly larger than SCOW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSET has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSET | SCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $2M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.82% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.74% | -10.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSET and SCOW
Explore further