Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

PSR vs RWL

Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

PSR

Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund

Invesco

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$52M

RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

Invesco

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$8.8B

Key differences

  • RWL is significantly larger than PSR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • PSR follows a active selection strategy; RWL uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

PSRRWL
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$52M$8.8B
Since20082008
Dividend yield2.38%1.28%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+17.6%+29.1%
CAGR 3Y+10.5%+20.2%
CAGR 5Y+3.7%+13.3%
Sharpe 3Y0.471.28
Volatility 1Y13.03%10.12%
Max drawdown-42.31%-36.04%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to PSR and RWL