Screener
PSTR vs FISR
PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF vs State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- FISR costs 0.57% less per year.
- FISR is significantly larger than PSTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSTR is classified as alternative, while FISR is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- PSTR follows a tactical allocation strategy; FISR uses index tracking.
- FISR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSTR | FISR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $57M | $514M |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 4.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.3% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.43% | 4.41% |
| Max drawdown | -14.73% | -20.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSTR and FISR
Explore further