Screener
PULS vs LMUB
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF vs iShares Long-Term National Muni Bd ETF
Key differences
- LMUB costs 0.06% less per year.
- PULS is significantly larger than LMUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PULS follows a active selection strategy; LMUB uses index tracking.
- PULS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PULS | LMUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.7B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.02% | 3.96% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.8% | +8.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.80 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.42% | 4.26% |
| Max drawdown | -5.85% | -5.51% |
Similar to PULS and LMUB
Explore further