Screener
PULS vs SUB
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF vs iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUB costs 0.08% less per year.
- PULS follows a active selection strategy; SUB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PULS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PULS | SUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.7B | $11.1B |
| Since | 2018 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 5.02% | 2.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.8% | +3.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | +3.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.80 | -0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.42% | 1.01% |
| Max drawdown | -5.85% | -9.46% |
Similar to PULS and SUB
Explore further