Screener
PULT vs NUSA
Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF - vs Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
- NUSA costs 0.11% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, PULT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- NUSA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PULT | NUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $34M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.62% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +3.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.12 | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.57% | 1.85% |
| Max drawdown | -0.33% | -9.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PULT and NUSA
Explore further