Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

PULT vs PPEM

Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF - vs Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF -

PULT

Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF -

Franklin Templeton Investments

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$43M

PPEM

Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF -

Franklin Templeton Investments

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$7M

Key differences

  • PULT costs 0.35% less per year.
  • PULT is significantly larger than PPEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • PULT is classified as fixed income, while PPEM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • PULT covers north america markets; PPEM covers emerging markets.
  • Over the last 3 years, PPEM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

PULTPPEM
Annual cost (TER)0.25%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$43M$7M
Since20232023
Dividend yield4.62%1.93%
Asset classfixed incomeequity
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+4.3%+53.9%
CAGR 3Y+5.4%+24.3%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y3.121.09
Volatility 1Y0.57%20.68%
Max drawdown-0.33%-18.44%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to PULT and PPEM