Screener
PVAL vs PGRO
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- PGRO costs 0.06% less per year.
- PVAL is significantly larger than PGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PVAL follows a active selection strategy; PGRO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PVAL | PGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.1B | $107M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 0.02% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.6% | +26.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.1% | +25.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.41 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.94% | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -16.64% | -34.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PVAL and PGRO
Explore further