Screener
PVI vs BRLN
Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF vs iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF
Key differences
- PVI costs 0.30% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, BRLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PVI | BRLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $54M |
| Since | 2007 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.16% | 6.51% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.3% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.7% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.34 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.61% | 3.03% |
| Max drawdown | -1.16% | -3.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PVI and BRLN
Explore further