Screener
PVI vs MINO
Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF vs PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- PVI costs 0.14% less per year.
- MINO is significantly larger than PVI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PVI follows a index tracking strategy; MINO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MINO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PVI | MINO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $623M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.16% | 3.83% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.0% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.6% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.40 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.62% | 2.74% |
| Max drawdown | -1.16% | -15.24% |
Similar to PVI and MINO
Explore further