Screener
PWB vs CGGR
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGR costs 0.16% less per year.
- CGGR is significantly larger than PWB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PWB covers north america markets; CGGR covers global.
- PWB follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWB | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $22.2B |
| Since | 2005 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.6% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +34.1% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.45 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.57% | 16.35% |
| Max drawdown | -32.36% | -28.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PWB and CGGR
Explore further