Screener
PWB vs FELG
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FELG costs 0.37% less per year.
- PWB follows a index tracking strategy; FELG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWB | FELG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $5.3B |
| Since | 2005 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +33.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.41% | 15.56% |
| Max drawdown | -32.36% | -23.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PWB and FELG
Explore further