Screener
PWB vs RFG
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RFG costs 0.20% less per year.
- PWB is significantly larger than RFG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWB | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $329M |
| Since | 2005 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +33.4% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.9% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.41% | 18.50% |
| Max drawdown | -32.36% | -42.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PWB and RFG
Explore further